<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comentarios en: Check call line: Cuando ser pasivo es rentable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.raulmestre.com/anotaciones/check-call-line-cuando-ser-pasivo-es-rentable/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.raulmestre.com/anotaciones/check-call-line-cuando-ser-pasivo-es-rentable</link>
	<description>Jugador profesional de poker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:57:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Por: rice</title>
		<link>http://www.raulmestre.com/anotaciones/check-call-line-cuando-ser-pasivo-es-rentable/comment-page-1#comment-1194</link>
		<dc:creator>rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raulmestre.com/anotaciones/check-call-line-cuando-ser-pasivo-es-rentable/#comment-1194</guid>
		<description>Parece ser que Allen Cunningham sí que sabe castellano y que además lee este blog utilizándolo contra Jamie Gold ;))))

Este es el link de youtube (la mano dura 5 minutos):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=St-hGyCPQAA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Parece ser que Allen Cunningham sí que sabe castellano y que además lee este blog utilizándolo contra Jamie Gold ;))))</p>
<p>Este es el link de youtube (la mano dura 5 minutos):<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=St-hGyCPQAA" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=St-hGyCPQAA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Por: Man</title>
		<link>http://www.raulmestre.com/anotaciones/check-call-line-cuando-ser-pasivo-es-rentable/comment-page-1#comment-1188</link>
		<dc:creator>Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 22:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raulmestre.com/anotaciones/check-call-line-cuando-ser-pasivo-es-rentable/#comment-1188</guid>
		<description>Alucino..

Supongo que Lady_Swan piensa que tienes éxito por la misma razón que yo..porque eres el puto amo :)

Saludos</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alucino..</p>
<p>Supongo que Lady_Swan piensa que tienes éxito por la misma razón que yo..porque eres el puto amo :)</p>
<p>Saludos</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Por: Raul</title>
		<link>http://www.raulmestre.com/anotaciones/check-call-line-cuando-ser-pasivo-es-rentable/comment-page-1#comment-1187</link>
		<dc:creator>Raul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raulmestre.com/anotaciones/check-call-line-cuando-ser-pasivo-es-rentable/#comment-1187</guid>
		<description>Si, es un buen jugador (o jugadora) y el problema es que no se pueden sentar juntos.

Un saludo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Si, es un buen jugador (o jugadora) y el problema es que no se pueden sentar juntos.</p>
<p>Un saludo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Por: el rata</title>
		<link>http://www.raulmestre.com/anotaciones/check-call-line-cuando-ser-pasivo-es-rentable/comment-page-1#comment-1186</link>
		<dc:creator>el rata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 15:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raulmestre.com/anotaciones/check-call-line-cuando-ser-pasivo-es-rentable/#comment-1186</guid>
		<description>un offtopic: raul, tengo entendido que compartes piso con otros jugadores de poker online. Puede haber algún problema por que varias cuentas jueguen desde la misma IP?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>un offtopic: raul, tengo entendido que compartes piso con otros jugadores de poker online. Puede haber algún problema por que varias cuentas jueguen desde la misma IP?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Por: Jorge</title>
		<link>http://www.raulmestre.com/anotaciones/check-call-line-cuando-ser-pasivo-es-rentable/comment-page-1#comment-1185</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raulmestre.com/anotaciones/check-call-line-cuando-ser-pasivo-es-rentable/#comment-1185</guid>
		<description>No parece tonta Lady_Swan, no.

Es ganadora en esos niveles, verdad???

Un saludo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No parece tonta Lady_Swan, no.</p>
<p>Es ganadora en esos niveles, verdad???</p>
<p>Un saludo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Por: Lady_Swan</title>
		<link>http://www.raulmestre.com/anotaciones/check-call-line-cuando-ser-pasivo-es-rentable/comment-page-1#comment-1184</link>
		<dc:creator>Lady_Swan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raulmestre.com/anotaciones/check-call-line-cuando-ser-pasivo-es-rentable/#comment-1184</guid>
		<description>You are successfull, Raul, b/c your opponents are multitablers. They don&#039;t research your game and treat you as usual player (short-mid-stacker) and use standard nit-play. But you are a unique player with unique strategy. So we make a lot of mistakes against your ranges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are successfull, Raul, b/c your opponents are multitablers. They don&#8217;t research your game and treat you as usual player (short-mid-stacker) and use standard nit-play. But you are a unique player with unique strategy. So we make a lot of mistakes against your ranges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Por: Raúl</title>
		<link>http://www.raulmestre.com/anotaciones/check-call-line-cuando-ser-pasivo-es-rentable/comment-page-1#comment-1183</link>
		<dc:creator>Raúl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raulmestre.com/anotaciones/check-call-line-cuando-ser-pasivo-es-rentable/#comment-1183</guid>
		<description>Well i dont think u are stupid, the single fact that u search info about a short (or midstacker) is just enough to show that u arent bad. Indeed, that u think that im opening widely is bad for me. I was able to profitabily open 100% against some players, but i cant open 50% against good ones. 

I agree that KQ would be better than J9 in this spot. But i dont think before this hand you would be pushing me often with hands like QX or TT to make the calling gap between both calling hands so big. What makes much better KQ there is that i would very often win when u check turn or river.

In the other hand, u re now much likely to push this river with a weaker hand, and obviosly KQ is better than J9 in this board.By the way i wasent so happy. But i couldnt find a better line to play this hand.

What makes you think im succesfull? 

Thanks for posting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well i dont think u are stupid, the single fact that u search info about a short (or midstacker) is just enough to show that u arent bad. Indeed, that u think that im opening widely is bad for me. I was able to profitabily open 100% against some players, but i cant open 50% against good ones. </p>
<p>I agree that KQ would be better than J9 in this spot. But i dont think before this hand you would be pushing me often with hands like QX or TT to make the calling gap between both calling hands so big. What makes much better KQ there is that i would very often win when u check turn or river.</p>
<p>In the other hand, u re now much likely to push this river with a weaker hand, and obviosly KQ is better than J9 in this board.By the way i wasent so happy. But i couldnt find a better line to play this hand.</p>
<p>What makes you think im succesfull? </p>
<p>Thanks for posting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Por: Lady_Swan</title>
		<link>http://www.raulmestre.com/anotaciones/check-call-line-cuando-ser-pasivo-es-rentable/comment-page-1#comment-1182</link>
		<dc:creator>Lady_Swan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 07:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raulmestre.com/anotaciones/check-call-line-cuando-ser-pasivo-es-rentable/#comment-1182</guid>
		<description>I think you are generally right, Raul. But it is wrong if you think that calling with 9&#039;s equals to calling with second pair in this hand (against me). Not all blufcatchers are equal.

Hero shows [ Jh Js ]two pairs Jacks and Threes .
Lady_Swan shows [ 7h 9h ]a pair of Threes .
Lady_Swan wins $447 USD from side pot #1 with a pair of Threes .
Hero wins $2,226 USD from the main pot with two pairs Jacks and Threes .

I would play the same way, I think (if I would a hero). But I woudn&#039;t be so happy as you while calling this )). I think, it is so-so. Probably +EV, but not a great one. If not JJ, but TT, I wouldn&#039;t say calling is good )). If you think like Raul, that 88=99=TT=JJ=KQ against me... I don&#039;t think it is true ). I&#039;m not a maniac bluffer (in obvious spots) as some guys think and value firing a little lighter )).

No, Raul, I don&#039;t know Spanish. I just was looking something about you. You are a very and very successfull short-mid-stacker )). Although I don&#039;t think that opening 50% of hands is very good )), but against stupid opponents as we are, it is fine and works well )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are generally right, Raul. But it is wrong if you think that calling with 9&#8242;s equals to calling with second pair in this hand (against me). Not all blufcatchers are equal.</p>
<p>Hero shows [ Jh Js ]two pairs Jacks and Threes .<br />
Lady_Swan shows [ 7h 9h ]a pair of Threes .<br />
Lady_Swan wins $447 USD from side pot #1 with a pair of Threes .<br />
Hero wins $2,226 USD from the main pot with two pairs Jacks and Threes .</p>
<p>I would play the same way, I think (if I would a hero). But I woudn&#8217;t be so happy as you while calling this )). I think, it is so-so. Probably +EV, but not a great one. If not JJ, but TT, I wouldn&#8217;t say calling is good )). If you think like Raul, that 88=99=TT=JJ=KQ against me&#8230; I don&#8217;t think it is true ). I&#8217;m not a maniac bluffer (in obvious spots) as some guys think and value firing a little lighter )).</p>
<p>No, Raul, I don&#8217;t know Spanish. I just was looking something about you. You are a very and very successfull short-mid-stacker )). Although I don&#8217;t think that opening 50% of hands is very good )), but against stupid opponents as we are, it is fine and works well )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Por: Raul</title>
		<link>http://www.raulmestre.com/anotaciones/check-call-line-cuando-ser-pasivo-es-rentable/comment-page-1#comment-1181</link>
		<dc:creator>Raul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 05:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raulmestre.com/anotaciones/check-call-line-cuando-ser-pasivo-es-rentable/#comment-1181</guid>
		<description>La mano de ejemplo e sun tanto distinta ya que su rango preflop podria ser mas estrecho, y AA, KK (ademas de QQ y posiblemente incluso AK o KQ) son manos que encajarian con su secuencia de bets (despues de todo, tu no puedes tener AA, KK o QQ y solo le preocupa AQ). Si su rango preflop es muy amplio en esta situacion las cosas mejoran, pero en caso contrario es mucho mas peligrosa. 

Por otro lado, es cierto que este/estos jugadores van a aprender. Pero en cualquier caso, estoy dificultando un arma en su arsenal y mejorando mis resultados con manos mediocres en la SB: Tmb yo puedo check callear algunas monster postflop para sacar partido del hecho que el apueste bluffs y values medios.Al final, en la situacion de equilibrio, he conseguido disminuir apreciablemente su % de faroles totales. Eso ya es algo intrínsecamente bueno (digamos que he dejado de ser explotable de una forma)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>La mano de ejemplo e sun tanto distinta ya que su rango preflop podria ser mas estrecho, y AA, KK (ademas de QQ y posiblemente incluso AK o KQ) son manos que encajarian con su secuencia de bets (despues de todo, tu no puedes tener AA, KK o QQ y solo le preocupa AQ). Si su rango preflop es muy amplio en esta situacion las cosas mejoran, pero en caso contrario es mucho mas peligrosa. </p>
<p>Por otro lado, es cierto que este/estos jugadores van a aprender. Pero en cualquier caso, estoy dificultando un arma en su arsenal y mejorando mis resultados con manos mediocres en la SB: Tmb yo puedo check callear algunas monster postflop para sacar partido del hecho que el apueste bluffs y values medios.Al final, en la situacion de equilibrio, he conseguido disminuir apreciablemente su % de faroles totales. Eso ya es algo intrínsecamente bueno (digamos que he dejado de ser explotable de una forma)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Por: rauliano</title>
		<link>http://www.raulmestre.com/anotaciones/check-call-line-cuando-ser-pasivo-es-rentable/comment-page-1#comment-1180</link>
		<dc:creator>rauliano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 03:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raulmestre.com/anotaciones/check-call-line-cuando-ser-pasivo-es-rentable/#comment-1180</guid>
		<description>que uno dice con un cañon  trataria de atraparme.Seguro para que resulte uno debe jugar tambien los pares de igual forma o sea con la apariencia de 3barrel sin intentar atrapar sino ya sabes te ponen en eso de &quot;weak means strong and strong means weak&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>que uno dice con un cañon  trataria de atraparme.Seguro para que resulte uno debe jugar tambien los pares de igual forma o sea con la apariencia de 3barrel sin intentar atrapar sino ya sabes te ponen en eso de &#8220;weak means strong and strong means weak&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
